(Bizpac Review) – The Supreme Court is heading left-wing immigration activist groups off at the pass.
The high court unanimously agreed to hear the Trump administration’s appeal of its travel ban order, and in also lifted most of the restrictions the lower courts placed on the order.
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) June 26, 2017
Lawyer and National Review columnist Dan McLaughlin noticed something significant the jurists placed in its order, and highlighted the relevant passage in his tweet.
Supreme Court, writing unanimously in the travel ban case, is wise to how liberal activist groups operate pic.twitter.com/Nu97q4omkY
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) June 26, 2017
In other words, in carving out exceptions to the travel ban the court recognized that some classes of foreign nationals should be afforded special consideration for entry into the country.
However, membership into one of those classes cannot be made out of whole cloth. The foreigner’s relationship to the United States must be genuine and not fabricated by some liberal pro-immigration group.
Conservatives applauded the Supreme Court’s foresight — and wisdom.
Very wise. The Refugee resettlement industry is big business for liberal activist groups https://t.co/FvmFxc37Qg
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) June 26, 2017
😂😂 Well spotted and well-closed lib loophole.
— All Hearing Ear (@1AllHearingEar) June 26, 2017
I voted for Trump to save the SC. I feel vindicated. If he does anything else….gravy.
— Anmarie (@LiberalHeretic) June 26, 2017
— Old Whig (@aClassicLiberal) June 26, 2017
— DotKam (@dotsword) June 26, 2017
Damn. Called them out. #MAGA
— Airborne Heel (@abnheel) June 26, 2017
And what groups may be affected by the order? Here’s a partial list.
— Peter McConeghy (@petersthoughts) June 26, 2017
But not everyone was happy with the court’s order.
— George Legacy (@GeorgeLegacySOS) June 26, 2017
Hillary paid this goon 400,000 dollars to go around the country attacking Trump! 👍🏻😎
— PresidentTrump (@RichardTBurnett) June 26, 2017
And how’d that work out for them?