House Democrats Panic – Quietly Debate Expanding Impeachment Articles Because Ukraine Is A Bust

(Gateway Pundit) – The House Democrats are panicking as they quietly debate expanding impeachment articles beyond Ukraine as they realize their narrative is not selling the public on removing Trump from office.

The Democrats want to impeach President Trump by Christmas, however, there is an internal debate as red-state Dems push back against impeachment and want to keep the investigation focused only on Ukraine.

The Schiff show trials backfired and polls show support for impeachment has collapsed.

Dozens of red state Democrat lawmakers quietly oppose impeachment because they know they will lose their jobs if they vote in favor of impeachment.

However, the radical, rabid Democrats are hoping to roll out the stale Muller report and highlight the ’10 instances of obstruction by President Trump’ — none of which Mueller decided to charge Trump with after two years of a bogus investigation.

Via The Washington Post:

Members of the House Judiciary Committee and other more liberal-minded lawmakers and congressional aides have been privately discussing the possibility of drafting articles that include obstruction of justice or other “high crimes” they believe are clearly outlined in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report — or allegations that Trump has used his office to benefit his bottom line.

The idea, however, is running into resistance from some moderate Democrats wary of impeachment blowback in their GOP-leaning districts, as well as Democratic leaders who sought to keep impeachment narrowly focused on allegations that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rivals, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk freely.

The debate is expected to play out in leadership and caucus meetings this week, as the House Intelligence Committee prepares to hand the impeachment inquiry to the House Judiciary Committee. The Intelligence Committee is scheduled to vote Tuesday night on its final report on Ukraine, allowing Judiciary to then work on writing articles of impeachment based on that document.

Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) blasted the House Dems on Monday night.

“They’re looking at returning to the Mueller playbook because they know they don’t have a case on Ukraine. Their problem is: they don’t have a case on either. This is textbook grasping at straws,” Meadows said.

thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/house-democrats-panic-quietly-debate-expanding-impeachment-articles-because-ukraine-is-a-bust/

10 COMMENTS

  1. Sad state of affairs to see what they are doing to this country. After today I can start spending my granddaughter college fund because with these people who testified are teaching the same crap she isn’t going to any of them. I don’t know how they could walk out thinking they knew anything about our Constitution. They were all Trump haters and thought it was funny bringing in a child when Bidens son an adult is off limits. Not funny at all. Done with them altogether.

  2. AND HERE WE GO…NOTHING HAS WORKED SO THEY’RE THINKING OF GOING “BACK” TO MUELLER’S INVESTIGATION REPORT TO MAKE UP MORE ACCUSATIONS…MORE & MORE LIES TO ATTEMPT TO “GET TRUMP.” PATHETIC! THE FACT IS TRUMP AND HIS GOVERNMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ARE GETTING CLOSER AND CLOSER TO OPENING THE PROVERBIAL “LID” ON ALL THE SWAMP DEALINGS IN WASHINGTON…THEY ARE RUNNING SCARED TO DEATH.

  3. nancy pelosi has had so many face lifts it is a wonder that her rectum is not under her nose wait a minute it is. it has to be with all of the shit she is saying

  4. Geez, what a conundrum for the Dims to sort out now. If they throw up their hands they look weak and a lot more stupid to their voters. If they push ahead they will look stupid to everyone else and still lose voters. In the end it still ends up in the senate where the rules will be different and the Dims will look stupid to all the voters. So just go all in and hope for the best, voters be damned.

  5. MEMO FOR SPEAKER PELOSI

    Nancy, imagine you are the commander of an infantry company which you are preparing to lead into a major ground combat operation in some foreign land with 230+/- at best average performing soldiers. And……with little notice you are forced to accept Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler as two of your three rifle platoon leaders. What do you do now?

    Would you care to know what I as a veteran commander of an infantry unit engaged in actual ground combat would do if I were in your boots (yes, Nancy even the girls in combat units must wear boots)? In that I have reliable information/intelligence as to the performance history of both of these individuals, I see I have but two courses of action depending upon my priorities. 1). If my priority is that of the safety/mission accomplishment of/by my 230 +- soldiers I have one course of action. 2). If my priority is my own self preservation I have another.

    In summary. If I choose priority #1, I arrange for both Schiff and Nadler to be accidentally shot. If I choose priority #2, I arrange for myself to be accidentally shot. But that’s just me.

    Soldier/Cop/Grunt, Retired

  6. The Democrat Party is sowing the seeds of its own destruction! There is no there, there, when it entails the impeachment of the President. It appears that they’ll never learn! I’ve never seen anyone in such a hurry to commit ideological suicide, both individually and collectively.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here